Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Some advice for Dems on immigration


Recently, I gave Republicans some advice about how to talk about the immigration issue - and, just as importantly, how not to talk about it. Now it's the Democrats' turn. They make their share of mistakes in discussing one of the most sensitive and controversial issues on the national agenda, and they need just as much coaching as do Republicans.

To begin with, Democrats need to stop thinking of themselves as inherently more enlightened than the competition when it comes to the immigration debate, and let their actions prove it. Many liberals take for granted that most Republicans are nativists and they're glad they don't have that failing. This fulfills the basic need of many on the left to feel morally superior to the rest of us, and reaffirms the idea that they alone can come up with a reasonable solution to our immigration problem.

I don't know about that. I get angry and racist e-mails from self-described liberal Democrats all the time, usually after I've defended Sarah Palin or praised George W. Bush. Such ugliness isn't limited to one political party. Besides, I'd wager that, once you brush away all the lofty rhetoric, most Democrats ultimately care about the same thing that most Republicans care about - winning elections and maintaining power.

And so, no matter what they promise while campaigning, they will stall or kill any legislation that threatens to cost them votes. That's why, even with Democrats controlling Congress since January 2007 and the White House since January 2009, nothing got done on immigration reform. In fact, it was a Democrat - former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel - who famously referred to the issue as the "third rail" of American politics.

Next, Democrats need to stop pandering to organized labor, which is a group that is always predisposed to view immigration as a problem because it sees immigrants as competition. Many unions have come around to the idea of legalizing illegal immigrants because it means a chance to enlist new members, but not if it means swallowing the GOP's demand to bring in additional batches of temporary guest workers. Organized labor believes that foreign workers of any kind - legal or illegal - threaten U.S. workers. And it contributes enough money to Democrats to get them to believe it too.

The left should make the argument to union workers that a completely legalized work force would benefit them because employers could no longer pay illegal workers less than those with a union card. Democrats might also throw in a dose of tough love by telling those union workers that, if they're suffering the embarrassment of being displaced by unauthorized, low-skilled, largely uneducated workers who often don't speak English, it might be time to acquire more skills or look for another line of work.

Lastly, Democrats should kick the habit of using the immigration issue to manipulate Latinos. They can't resist exploiting how tone-deaf the GOP can be on the immigration issue, perhaps assuming: "What alternative do Hispanic voters have?"

Consider the liberal reader who recently wrote to take issue with my contention that President Barack Obama was wise to support the tax-cut compromise. The reader insisted that Obama was foolish to try to "make people who despise him play nice" and that the GOP was sure to thwart the rest of his agenda. And then the reader threw in this gratuitous item at the end: "Good luck with the Dream Act, btw."

So, in response to a column about tax cuts, a reader makes sure to inform a Mexican-American columnist that Republicans are unlikely to pass a bill that gives undocumented immigrants legal status if they attend college or join the military? What does one have to do with the other?

As a party, Democrats need to show some respect. If those on the left think a piece of legislation makes sense, then pass it. Don't use it a ploy, or hold it out as a carrot to make a donkey pull a cart. When dealing with the immigration issue, Democrats should spend more time resolving obstacles - and less time looking for ways to get mileage out of the impasse.


Australia gets Afghan deal to return asylum seekers

AN arrangement to send failed Afghan asylum seekers back to Kabul will help Australia deal with unauthorised boat arrivals, a Labor frontbencher says. Canberra and Kabul reportedly have agreed on a draft memorandum of understanding that paves the way for involuntary returns. The historic memorandum could be signed within weeks, The Australian said today.

Parliamentary secretary Mark Dreyfus says discussions between the two nations have been underway for some time. "It's an important part of any system for dealing with unauthorised arrivals," he told Sky News today. "We prefer that people went on a voluntary basis after their claims are rejected. "If they don't it's important ... to make sure it's done in an orderly way."

Liberal backbencher Paul Fletcher says reaching agreement would help deal with overcrowding in Australia's detention centres, which currently house about 6000 people. "That (figure) includes a significant number of people (who've) been denied refugee status and ... (are) required to return to their homeland," he said.

Figures from the immigration department show that 4342 Afghans have arrived since late 2008 and only two have voluntarily returned to their home country in that time.

Opposition Immigration spokesman Scott Morrison says any deal is unlikely to help with the immediate problem of overcrowding in detention centres. "If they do get to a deal no-one will be going home anytime soon because of the ability to pursue ... failed claims in the courts," he told the Macquarie Network.


No comments:

Post a Comment