Rep. Steve King: Gang of 8 Immigration Bill `Destroys the Rule of Law'

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) said immigration reform being considered in the Senate "destroys the rule of law"  by granting amnesty to illegal aliens.

"It destroys the rule of law," King said at a Tuesday press conference outside Capitol Hill.  "And the rule of law is an essential pillar of American exceptionalism, many people come here because we have equal justice under the law."

"If we reward people who break the law, they're unlikely to raise their children to respect it," he said.  "The rule of law, at least with regard to immigration, would be destroyed."

"And the promise that the law would be enforced from this point forward?  I don't know how we can listen to that with a straight face," King said.

The "Gang of Eight" bill, brought forth by a bipartisan group of Senators, including Florida Republican Marco Rubio, is currently in mark-up in the Judiciary Committee.  The bill (S. 744) would give a pathway to citizenship for an estimated 11 million illegal immigrants.  It also requires the Department of Homeland Security to secure the border within five years-but if not, the legislation will set up a commission to address the issue.

King and other House Republicans said on Monday that they offered "another viewpoint" from Republicans who believe amnesty is necessary for the GOP following the 2012 election.   He said the bill is "being stampeded" without enough scrutiny.

"The people on the other side of the aisle, they want amnesty for a number of reasons, the biggest one it's a big political boost for them," King said.  "I don't understand why Republicans think it's a good idea, but somehow they've bought into this idea."

He also said the bill is a "terrible idea" from an economic perspective.  "At no stage in their lives does the universe of those who would receive amnesty make a net financial contribution to this country," King said.  "At no stage.  Not a single year."

A member of the House Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security, King cited the Heritage Foundation's recent report by Robert Rector and Jason Richwine that found granting amnesty to illegal immigrants would add $6.3 trillion to the federal deficit and $9.4 trillion in government benefits to the newly minted citizens.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) has also warned that the bill gives Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano "virtually unlimited discretion to waiver" prohibitions on obtaining legal status, such as criminal activity or previous deportation.

"The big question I would pose out there is, why?" King said.  "Why is that 844-page bill, why is it good for America and Americans?"

"I can't get that answer on why it's good for us," he said

SOURCE





Immigration Has Little Impact on U.S. Aging

New Census projections show small effect on working-age share of population

 The Census Bureau has released new projections which examine the impact of different levels of immigration on the United States. The projections, analyzed by the Center for Immigration Studies, show what demographers have long known: immigration has only a small impact on slowing the aging of America. Many promoters of the Gang of Eight immigration bill, which roughly doubles legal immigration, argue it's needed to forestall aging, but the Bureau's new projections show immigration's impact is slight.

The Center's Director of Research, Steven Camarota, observes, "Many worry that there won't be enough workers in the future to support the economy or pay for government. While immigrants often arrive young, and have somewhat larger families than natives, immigrants age just like everyone else, and the differences with natives are not large enough to fundamentally alter the nation's age structure. The debate over immigration should focus on other areas where it actually has a significant effect."

The tables released by the Census Bureau show:

The Bureau's high-immigration projection shows that if net immigration totals 67 million by 2060, a total of 57.3% of the U.S. population will be of working age (18 to 64). The low-immigration projection (35 million immigrants by 2060) shows a working-age share of 56.4%.

The high-immigration projection assumes 67 million arrivals by 2060, roughly double the 35 million that the low projection assumes. Yet the working-age (18-64) share of the population increases by less than one percentage point.

Turning to the 65 and older population, the new projections also show immigration has only a small impact. The high-immigration projections show that 21.3% of the population would be of retirement age in 2060, compared to 22.6% under the low-immigration projection.

Mathematically, immigration levels simply cannot have a large impact on aging. An important 1992 article in Demography, the leading academic journal in the field, points out that "constant inflows of immigrants, even at relatively young ages, do not necessarily rejuvenate low-fertility populations. In fact, immigration may even contribute to population aging."

The Census Bureau concluded in projections done in 2000 that immigration is a "highly inefficient" means for increasing the percentage of the population that is of working-age in the long run.

To understand why immigration has a small impact on aging it is helpful to remember that although many immigrants arrive young, they grow older like everyone else. As a result, in 2012 the average age of an immigrant was 43 years compared to 37 years for natives.

It is also important to note that the Total Fertility Rate in the United States (for immigrants and the native-born together) is 1.98 children per women (ages 15-49). Without immigrants, the rate is 1.88. So immigrants do increase the nation's TFR, but only by .1 children on average.

The Census Bureau's new projections are here

Table 17 shows the net immigration levels under the Bureau's high and low immigration assumptions. Table 3 shows the share of the population to 2060 that is of working age - ages 18 through 64 - under the Bureau's high- and low-immigration projections.

The 1992 Demography article mentioned above was authored by Carl P. Schmertmann. It is entitled: "Immigrants' Ages and the Structure of Stationary Populations with Below-Replacement Fertility", (Vol. 29, No. 4). The 2000 Census Bureau population projections mentioned above can be found here (PDF). The average age figures for immigrants and natives discussed above is from the public use file of the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey from 2012. The Total Fertility Rate discussed above is from the public use file of the 2011 American Community Survey, also collected by the Census Bureau.

View the Senate bill, CIS Senate testimony and commentary here

The above is a press release from from Center for Immigration Studies. 1522 K St. NW, Suite 820,  Washington, DC 20005, (202) 466-8185 fax: (202) 466-8076.  Email: center@cis.org. Contact: Marguerite Telford, 202-466-8185, mrt@cis.org.  The Center for Immigration Studies is an independent research institution which examines the impact of immigration on the United States.  The Center for Immigration Studies is not affiliated with any other organization