Immigration Watch International (2): 'Absolute Chaos': Illegal Alien Mob Overruns Texas National Guard at the Border

Sunday, March 24, 2024

'Absolute Chaos': Illegal Alien Mob Overruns Texas National Guard at the Border

While President Joe Biden, impeached Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, and Border Czar Kamala Harris continue to insist that their policies are not responsible for the border crisis — one the White House & Co. denied existed for years — while also erroneously stating they're powerless to do anything about the chaos, the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border continues to get worse.

In a scene that looks more like the border of some war-torn third-world country, and after multiple months of record-setting illegal alien crossings on Biden's watch, a horde of illegal aliens have now stormed Texas authorities in an attempt to forcibly and unlawfully enter the U.S. To call it an "invasion" is anything but hyperbole.

Watch as Texas National Guard soldiers on the U.S. side of the border near El Paso became overrun on Thursday afternoon, via the New York Post's Jennie Taer (warning: language).

"Absolute chaos," indeed. Notably, this is the kind of chaos President Biden and his administration — including through the federal Department of Justice — are seeking to incentivize and normalize by suing Texas to block state efforts to secure the border, a duty in which Biden is entirely derelict.

As Townhall reported earlier this week, the Supreme Court of the United States on Tuesday gave Texas the green light to implement SB 4, a state law allowing Lone Star State officials to arrest, detain, and deport illegal aliens. But almost immediately after the Supreme Court ruled that Texas could proceed under SB 4 pending a ruling from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, that court again blocked Texas from operating under the state law to allow the removal of illegal aliens.

As a result, Texas officials are left only able to try dissuading illegal aliens from unlawfully entering the U.S. after which most of them are processed and released into the country's interior pending an asylum hearing, dates for which are now stretching more than a half-decade into the future — even when a significant majority are ineligible for asylum.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2024/03/21/watch-as-illegal-migrant-riot-storms-texas-n2636821

***********************************

My other blogs. Main ones below:

http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)

http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)

http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)

http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)

http://snorphty.blogspot.com (TONGUE-TIED)

http://australian-politics.blogspot.com/ (AUSTRALIAN POLITICS)

http://awesternheart.blogspot.com.au/ (THE PSYCHOLOGIST)

http://jonjayray.com/blogall.html More blogs

*******************************

No comments:

Post a Comment

Background

Postings from Brisbane, Australia by John Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.) -- former member of the Australia-Soviet Friendship Society, former anarcho-capitalist and former member of the British Conservative party.

Why is "La Raza" the one Spanish term that is NEVER translated in the American mass media? Because translating it would make it a lot less respectable. It means "THE RACE" -- The mixed Hispanic "race" of Mexico. Racism is fine South of the Rio Grande only, apparently.

The "line" of this blog is that immigration should be SELECTIVE. That means that:

1). A national government should be in control of it. The U.S. and U.K. governments are not but the Australian government has shown that the government of a prosperous Western country can be. Up until its loss of office in 2007, the conservative Howard government had all but eliminated illegal immigration. The present Leftist government has however restarted the flow of illegals by repealing many of the Howard government regulations.

2). Selectivity should be based on "the content of a man's character, not on the color of his skin", as MLK said. To expand that a little: Immigrants should only be accepted if they as individuals seem likely to make a positive net contribution to the country. Many "refugees" would fail that test: Muslims and Africans particularly. Educational level should usually be a pretty fair proxy for the individual's likely value to the receiving country. There will, of course, be exceptions but it is nonetheless unlikely that a person who has not successfully completed High School will make a net positive contribution to a modern Western society.

3). Immigrants should be neither barred NOR ACCEPTED solely because they are of some particular ethnic origin. Blacks are vastly more likely to be criminal than are whites or Chinese, for instance, but some whites and some Chinese are criminal. It is the criminality that should matter, not the race.

4). The above ideas are not particularly blue-sky. They roughly describe the policies of the country where I live -- Australia. I am critical of Australian policy only insofar as the "refugee" category for admission is concerned. All governments have tended to admit as refugees many undesirables. It seems to me that more should be required of them before refugees are admitted -- for instance a higher level of education or a business background.

5). Perhaps the most amusing assertion in the immigration debate is that high-income countries like the USA and Britain NEED illegal immigrants to do low-paid menial work. "Who will pick our crops?" (etc.) is the cry. How odd it is then that Australians get all the normal services of a modern economy WITHOUT illegal immigrants! Yes: Before the pandemic, you usually COULD buy a lettuce in Australia for a dollar or thereabouts. And Australia IS a major exporter of primary products.

6). I am a libertarian conservative so I reject the "open door" policy favoured by many libertarians and many Leftists. Both those groups tend to have a love of simplistic generalizations that fail to deal with the complexity of the real world. It seems to me that if a person has the right to say whom he/she will have living with him/her in his/her own house, so a nation has the right to admit to living among them only those individuals whom they choose.

I can be reached on jonjayray@hotmail.com -- or leave a comment on any post. Abusive comments will be deleted.

Immigration Watch International (2)

Sunday, March 24, 2024

'Absolute Chaos': Illegal Alien Mob Overruns Texas National Guard at the Border

No comments:

Post a Comment

Background

Other blogs

Blog Archive

Contributors