Immigration Watch International (2): New Report Tracks Illegal Immigrants After Arranged Travel

Tuesday, February 14, 2023

New Report Tracks Illegal Immigrants After Arranged Travel – See Where They are Being Sent

There is a new report from the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project that gives details on how non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have facilitated the last part of travel for illegal immigrants after they have successfully reached the United States. This has been significantly on the increase since Biden entered the White House.

The Oversight Project compiled the report by sampling about 30,000 mobile devices that were geofenced to several of these NGOs along the border. Here is the process, illegal immigrants hand themselves over to Border Patrol and then they are processed and released if Title 42 does not apply to their nationality.

Device pings were captured throughout the month of January 2022, in four different phases.

Phase One actually geofenced the physical location of the Val Verde Border Humanitarian Center and the Del Rio Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Station. There were around 400 devices ping at those sites.

Phase Two involved the geofencing of 20 NGO facilities in border states and there were approximately 22,000 devices pinged on-premises.

Phase Three involved geofencing 13 NGO locations located close to the border and there were 5,000 devices pinged on-premises.

Phase Four of the investigation focused on geofencing Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley which is located in San Juan, Texas. There were 3,400 devices pinged on the premises.

The bottom line is that this report shows that the most popular destination for these immigrants is the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Orlando.

“The investigation confirmed that a host of NGOs are actively facilitating the Biden border crisis. Overflow from Customs and Border Protection is being transferred to these organizations so that Border Patrol avoids overcrowded facilities. These organizations apply for, and receive, taxpayer money to provide processing and transportation services and infrastructure to facilitate the migration of illegal aliens into the interior of the country,” according to Mike Howell, director of the Oversight Project.

This investigation is the first ever to document the physical movement of illegal aliens into the interior of the country. They have uncovered a mass resettlement program in which the White House administration works hand-in-hand with NGOs.

https://patriotnewsfeed.com/new-report-tracks-illegal-immigrants-after-arranged-travel-see-where-they-are-being-sent/

***********************************

My other blogs. Main ones below:

http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)

http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)

http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)

http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)

http://australian-politics.blogspot.com/ (AUSTRALIAN POLITICS)

http://awesternheart.blogspot.com.au/ (THE PSYCHOLOGIST)

http://jonjayray.com/blogall.html More blogs

*******************************

No comments:

Post a Comment

Background

Postings from Brisbane, Australia by John Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.) -- former member of the Australia-Soviet Friendship Society, former anarcho-capitalist and former member of the British Conservative party.

Why is "La Raza" the one Spanish term that is NEVER translated in the American mass media? Because translating it would make it a lot less respectable. It means "THE RACE" -- The mixed Hispanic "race" of Mexico. Racism is fine South of the Rio Grande only, apparently.

The "line" of this blog is that immigration should be SELECTIVE. That means that:

1). A national government should be in control of it. The U.S. and U.K. governments are not but the Australian government has shown that the government of a prosperous Western country can be. Up until its loss of office in 2007, the conservative Howard government had all but eliminated illegal immigration. The present Leftist government has however restarted the flow of illegals by repealing many of the Howard government regulations.

2). Selectivity should be based on "the content of a man's character, not on the color of his skin", as MLK said. To expand that a little: Immigrants should only be accepted if they as individuals seem likely to make a positive net contribution to the country. Many "refugees" would fail that test: Muslims and Africans particularly. Educational level should usually be a pretty fair proxy for the individual's likely value to the receiving country. There will, of course, be exceptions but it is nonetheless unlikely that a person who has not successfully completed High School will make a net positive contribution to a modern Western society.

3). Immigrants should be neither barred NOR ACCEPTED solely because they are of some particular ethnic origin. Blacks are vastly more likely to be criminal than are whites or Chinese, for instance, but some whites and some Chinese are criminal. It is the criminality that should matter, not the race.

4). The above ideas are not particularly blue-sky. They roughly describe the policies of the country where I live -- Australia. I am critical of Australian policy only insofar as the "refugee" category for admission is concerned. All governments have tended to admit as refugees many undesirables. It seems to me that more should be required of them before refugees are admitted -- for instance a higher level of education or a business background.

5). Perhaps the most amusing assertion in the immigration debate is that high-income countries like the USA and Britain NEED illegal immigrants to do low-paid menial work. "Who will pick our crops?" (etc.) is the cry. How odd it is then that Australians get all the normal services of a modern economy WITHOUT illegal immigrants! Yes: Before the pandemic, you usually COULD buy a lettuce in Australia for a dollar or thereabouts. And Australia IS a major exporter of primary products.

6). I am a libertarian conservative so I reject the "open door" policy favoured by many libertarians and many Leftists. Both those groups tend to have a love of simplistic generalizations that fail to deal with the complexity of the real world. It seems to me that if a person has the right to say whom he/she will have living with him/her in his/her own house, so a nation has the right to admit to living among them only those individuals whom they choose.

I can be reached on jonjayray@hotmail.com -- or leave a comment on any post. Abusive comments will be deleted.

Immigration Watch International (2)

Tuesday, February 14, 2023

New Report Tracks Illegal Immigrants After Arranged Travel – See Where They are Being Sent

No comments:

Post a Comment

Background

Other blogs

Blog Archive

Contributors